Legal Opinion
In re Corey E.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 20, 1996No. 14557PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The respondents appeal from the trial court’s judgment extending a previously ordered commitment of their two minor children to the department of children and families (DCF).1 They assert that Gen*368eral Statutes § 46b-129 (e)2 precludes an extension of commitment where, as here, DCF has filed a petition to terminate parental rights. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. The two minor children were adjudicated neglected on March 20, 1992, and committed to the custody of DCF for a period of eighteen months. On August 10, 1993, DCF successfully…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re John G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Cesar G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re David L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Twichell v. GuiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.