Legal Opinion

Wnek v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1953No. Appeals, 164 and 165PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

This case is scarcely to be taken as a model of expeditious and purposeful litigation. The accident which gave rise to it occurred on October 30, 1947, and now, nearly six years later, the parties have not even begun to try the case on its merits but are still enmeshed in mere procedural controversy.

The accident itself, a collision between two automobiles, was apparently not a serious one. The owner and operator of the damaged car, Edward J. Wnek, claims damages of $31.00 for expenses and $525.00 for alleged depreciation in the value of his automobile.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Hess v. Vinton Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Srednick v. SylakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Moran v. G. & W.H. Corson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Martinelli v. MulloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Hileman v. MorelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. DICKSON v. LEWANDOWSKISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API