Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants Sears and General Electric contend that the lower court erred in this products liability action by denying their motions for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial on grounds that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Appellant General Electric also contends the lower court erred in evidentiary rulings, in instructing the *449jury, and in requiring it to indemnify Sears. We find these contentions without merit and, accordingly, affirm.

In reviewing a denial of judgment n.o.v: we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner and draw…