Hileman v. Morelli
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
This case presents a difficult procedural question concerning the interrelationship between the joinder rules and discontinuance practice. The question itself can only be understood in light of the peculiar scenario in which it arose, which was as follows.
On December 14, 1989, appellees, Dorothy Weidig Hileman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Weidig and individually, and her four children filed a complaint naming appellee Nason Hospital and appellant Ruth Morelli, Executrix of the Estate of Marion A. Morelli, M.D., as defendants. The complaint asserted wrongful death and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Glomb v. GlombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- L.B. Foster Co. v. Charles Caracciolo Steel & Metal Yard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Sehl v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bianculli v. Turner Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Boggs v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Borough of Pleasant Hills v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.