Legal Opinion

Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1952No. Appeals, 36 and 37PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

Having in mind that summary judgments should not be entered on pleadings save in very clear cases the present judgments must be reversed and the mutual rights and liabilities of the parties left for determination at a trial of the issues.

The A. S. Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc. was the lessee of certain premises on Market Street abutting in the rear on Court Street in the City of Harrisburg. It engaged R. S. Noonan, Inc. to make extensive structural changes in the buildings. The work necessitated the demolition of parts of the existing structures, and in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Giordano v. Clement Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Jackson v. GleasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Zachrel v. Universal Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Brown v. DickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API