Legal Opinion
Lumen v. Anderson
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 10, 2012No. 08-0514-CV-W-HFSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS AND (2) DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE
HOWARD F. SACHS, Senior District Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class. Also pending — although not fully briefed — is Defendants’ Motion to Strike. For the following reasons, latter motion (Doc. # 114) is denied and the former motion (Doc. # 66) is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This case alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act on the part of FCStone and certain of its officers and directors. A Consolidated Complaint was filed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- City of Cape Coral Mun. Firefighters' Ret. Plan v. Emergent Biosolutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Strougo v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Smilovits v. First Solar, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Petrie v. Electronic Game Card, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.