Legal Opinion
Pope v. Farmers' Union & Milling Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1900No. Sac. No. 620PublishedCited by 12 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover from defendant the value -of certain wheat deposited under the terms of the following written contract:
“Stockton, Cal., July 31, 1897.
“Received of Mrs. L. C. Pope, in the Eureka warehouse, situated on Levee street, Stockton, the following described merchandise, which we agree to deliver (damage by the elements excepted) upon the surrender of this certificate and payment of charges, twenty-seven hundred seventy-six sacks wheat, weighing three hundred eighty-three thousand one hundred forty-six pounds. Rates of storage, seventy-five cents per ton for the season ending…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Polack v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Chidester v. Consolidated Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Fay v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Ahlgren v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hamer v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Kaye v. M'DivaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Newman v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.