Legal Opinion
Kaye v. M'Divani
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1935No. Civ. 9055PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Respondent leased in writing to appellant a furnished residence for the term from March 9 to September 9, 1931, at a rental of $400 per month. Upon the expiration of the term of the lease appellant held over by mutual oral agreement to October 9, 1931, at which time the premises were vacated. Attached to the lease was an inventory which listed the furniture, furnishings and equipment of the residence and fixed the valuation of the several items thereof. Among the items listed in the inventory was one Shah Habbas blue (antique) rug, 10.1x14.4, “very rare”, valued at $6,000.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pope v. Farmers' Union & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Klein v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Fratt v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ambassador Airways, Inc. v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Commercial Acetylene Supply Co. v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. System Auto Parks, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
- Augustine v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Continental Manufacturing Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyds LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Schimmelfennig v. Grove Farm Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.