Legal Opinion

Cuneo Press v. Claybourn Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 13, 1937No. 6038PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge,

Appellee brought this suit in the District Court against appellant to recover the purchase price of two printing presses at $42,-000 each, less advancements made, and recovered $60,000.. , . m o moi By written contract, on April 8, 1931, ap J ^ , . ’ c \ n j * , ^ „ , ’ ’ . , ddn'er and aPPdlant t0 huJ nSpeCf P,resses at a Pr,1Ce°ff ^J000 each' The vendor warranted that the presses ,, . . , , . would run at a maximum speed not less than 5,500 sheets per hour, with a guaranteed production of 4,200 sheets, and that the product would be of a certain desired quality. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  2. Kadish v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Goldsborough v. GableIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bailey v. Valley National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. The People v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Gruber v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API