Kadish v. Young
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by A. N. Young and George Bullen, against L. J. Kadish and Charles Fleischman. A trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment of $20,000 damages against the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholeield
>
This was assumpsit, by appellees, against- appellants, to i| recover damages sustained by the breach of an alleged con-5 tract, whereby, on the 15th of December, 1880, appellees sold to appellants 100,000 Jmshels of No. 2 barley, at one dollar and twenty cents per bushel, to be delivered .to 'appellants, and paid for by them, 'at such time during the month of January, 1881, as appellees should elect. Appellees tendered to appellants warehouse receipts for 100,000 bushels of No. 2 barley on the 12th of January, 1881, but appellants refused to rcc^tfMft receipts and pay for the° barley. Within…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Crist v. ArmourNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Collins v. DelaporteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Follansbee v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- City of Chicago v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Greenwall Theatrical Circuit Co. v. MarkowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.