Legal Opinion

State v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 2003No. 200000234, 200011607, and 209914228 A112043 (Control), A112044, and A112045PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals two judgments of conviction arising out of consolidated prosecutions. First, he argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal on a charge of first-degree burglary. Next, defendant demurs, for the first time on appeal, to his indictment on a charge of carrying a concealed weapon. We reject without further discussion defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence on first-degree burglary. We write to address only defendant’s challenge to the indictment on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon. For reasons we explain below,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. OatneyOregon Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. KirkebyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. PervishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. MurgaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API