Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1925No. 4195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an action to quiet title to divers parcels of land in Davis county, Utah. The plaintiffs are the owners of the lands in severalty, and allege in their complaint that defendant claims some interest therein adverse to the plaintiffs, but that said claim is without foundation. The complaint is in the usual form in an action to quiet title. Defendant, by its answer, admits that plaintiffs are the owners of the land, but alleges that defendant is an irrigation district organized in pursuance of the provisions of chapter 68, Sess. Laws‘Utah 1919, and that its only claim of interest in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In re Crow Creek Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drake v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Tomich v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Argyle v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Lake Creek Irrigation Co. v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. North Tintic Mining Co. v. Crockett, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API