Legal Opinion · Dissent

North Tintic Mining Co. v. Crockett, Secy. of State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1929No. 4821Published

1Dissent

Any corporation, foreign or domestic (with certain exceptions not material here), before engaging in business in this state is required by statute to pay an annual license tax computed upon and graduated according to its authorized capital stock. As applied to a corporation whose capital stock is employed in interstate commerce, and whose property represented by its capital stock is in substantial part outside of the state, the statute has been held invalid as resulting in such case in burdening interstate commerce and taxing property beyond the jurisdiction of the state.

The case before us is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ratterman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. BrickellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API