Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lake Creek Irrigation Co. v. Clyde

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1969No. 11148Published

1DissentTuckett, Justice

(dissenting) :

I dissent. I am unable to agree with that portion of the main opinion which affirms the ruling of the lower court to the effect that the quitclaim deed and contract which were signed by the president and secretary of the corporation were ratified by the board of directors of the plaintiff. It seems to me that the record is quite clear that the members of the board of directors of the plaintiff corporation had no knowledge whatsoever of the existence of the deed and contract or that the instruments had been executed and it cannot be said that the board ratified purported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lochwitz v. Pine Tree Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Copper King Mining Co. v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Anderson v. Grantsville North Willow Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jackson v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Aggeller & Musser Seed Co. v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API