Legal Opinion

Argyle v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1929No. 4778PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This suit in equity was commenced by plaintiff William H. Argyle and 113 others against the Bonneville irrigation district, Davis county, and other defendants who are directors of the irrigation district, the commissioners, clerk, treasurer, and assessor of Davis county, to perpetually enjoin the levy and collection of any assessments for water allotments to the lands of plaintiffs by the irrigation district. These assessments are attacked upon the ground, as alleged, that neither the Bonneville irrigation district, nor Davis county, nor the officers mentioned, ever at any time acquired…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Moore v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Todd v. BighamOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Todd v. BighamOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API