Legal Opinion

Hagen v. U-Haul Co. of Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 28, 2009No. 08-cv-1197PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs, Robert and Dale Hagen, initiated this civil action against the Defendants, U-Haul Co. of Tennessee, Keith O’Brien individually and doing business as West Tennessee Moving Company, Ronald Mathisen individually and doing business as Golden Eagle Transportation, U-Haul International, Inc., U-Haul Co. of Arizona, and General Motors Corporation (“GMC”), in the Circuit Court of Henry County, Tennessee. The Defendants removed the case to…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. AF Holdings LLC v. Does 1-1,058District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Williams v. CITY OF MILAN, TENN.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Celesta Williams v. Magnolia Bank, Inc. et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  5. Chad Farley, et al. v. Cardinal Finance Company Limited Partnership, et al.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API