Legal Opinion
Williams v. CITY OF MILAN, TENN.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided September 15, 2009No. 1:08-cv-01235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDMENT CLAIM AND DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S REMAINING STATE CLAIMS
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are several dispositive motions, including: Defendant Chris Crider’s (“Crider”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amendment Claim (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) No. 45); Defendant City of Milan’s (the “City”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amendment Claim (D.E. No. 47); the City’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Tennessee Human Rights Act Claim (D.E. No. 54); and the City’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Whitney v. City of MilanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Keri Williams v. The City of Milan, Tennessee and Mayor Chris Crider, in his official and individual capacitiesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011