Legal Opinion

Chad Farley, et al. v. Cardinal Finance Company Limited Partnership, et al.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 6, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00105Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE CHAD FARLEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 3:26-cv-105 v. ) ) Judge Atchley CARDINAL FINANCE COMPANY ) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Poplin ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Cardinal Finance Company Limited Partnership’s (“Cardinal Finance”) Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [Doc. 42] and Defendant Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C.’s (“MWZM”) Rule 21 Motion to Drop MWZM as a Party [Doc. 44]. The pro se Plaintiffs did not file a response to the motions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API