Chad Farley, et al. v. Cardinal Finance Company Limited Partnership, et al.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE CHAD FARLEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 3:26-cv-105 v. ) ) Judge Atchley CARDINAL FINANCE COMPANY ) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Poplin ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Cardinal Finance Company Limited Partnership’s (“Cardinal Finance”) Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [Doc. 42] and Defendant Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C.’s (“MWZM”) Rule 21 Motion to Drop MWZM as a Party [Doc. 44]. The pro se Plaintiffs did not file a response to the motions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.