Legal Opinion
AF Holdings LLC v. Does 1-1,058
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0048PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
As in numerous other cases pending in this and other jurisdictions across the country, this ease involves a copyright owner’s effort to protect a copyrighted work from unknown individuals, who are allegedly illegally copying and distributing the work on the Internet. Plaintiff AF Holdings LLC (“AF Holdings”) alleges that 1,058 unknown individuals used a peer-to-peer file-sharing application, called BitTorrent, on their computers to download and distribute the plaintiffs movie, Popular Demand. See generally CompL, ECF No. 1. In support of the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-14District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. McFerran Home Furnishings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-11District Court, District of Columbia · 2012