Legal Opinion
City of Jamestown v. Dardis
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 2000No. 20000109, 20000110PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] John Timothy Dardis II appealed his convictions for minor in possession/consumption of alcohol and disorderly conduct. Dardis entered a conditional plea of guilty, with right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of entry into his home. We reverse and remand because the police officer entered Dardis’s home without a warrant or a valid exception to the warrant requirement, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and the evidence should have been suppressed.
[¶ 2] On the evening of January 29,1999, at about 11:30 p.m., the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Fargo v. WonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ParizekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.