State v. Matthews
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Anthony Charles Matthews appealed from a criminal judgment entered following conditional pleas of guilty for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, concluding that under the *30circumstances, law enforcement officers were able to enter Matthews’ residence and conduct a warrantless search for information under the emergency doctrine.
I
[¶ 2] In the early morning hours of October 24, 2001, a dispatcher at the Fargo Police Department received a 911 emergency call from a woman…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MorinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.