Legal Opinion

State v. Matthews

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2003No. 20020261PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Anthony Charles Matthews appealed from a criminal judgment entered following conditional pleas of guilty for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, concluding that under the *30circumstances, law enforcement officers were able to enter Matthews’ residence and conduct a warrantless search for information under the emergency doctrine.

I

[¶ 2] In the early morning hours of October 24, 2001, a dispatcher at the Fargo Police Department received a 911 emergency call from a woman…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MorinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API