Legal Opinion

State v. Heitzmann

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2001No. 20010017PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Craig Heitzmann appealed from a criminal conviction entered upon his conditional guilty plea to class C felony possession of a controlled substance. We conclude the trial court did not err in denying Heitzmann’s suppression motion because his Fourth Amendment rights were not violated during the search conducted in this case. We, therefore, affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On the evening of April 19, 2000, a Valley City police officer was on patrol when he received a call from a deputy on the Stutsman County Drug Task Force stating a pickup driven by Chris Jacobson, whose license was…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. GenreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. TognottiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API