Legal Opinion
City of Fargo v. Wonder
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 2002No. 20010263PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] The City of Fargo appealed from an order suppressing statements made by Nancy Wonder and the results of a preliminary breath screening test administered to Wonder. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On April 7, 2001, law enforcement officers investigated a loud party at an apartment in Fargo. The apartment’s residents .allowed the police officers to enter. The officers secured the premises and did not allow anyone to leave. There is some dispute about what occurred after the officers entered.
[¶ 3] The trial court found that the officers asked those partygoers who were under the age of 21…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.