Legal Opinion

State v. Mitzel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2004No. 20030359PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ryan Mitzel is appealing from a South Central Judicial District Court criminal judgment and conviction upon a conditional plea of guilty for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, a class B felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. Mitzel argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that he claims was obtained in violation of his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. We reverse and remand, concluding the district court erred in denying Mitzel’s motion to suppress.

I

[¶ 2] On February 15, 2003, Bismarck…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Jackie David MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Robert Ross McCaleb and Brenda PageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Fletcher v. Town of ClintonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. GrafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. GenreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API