Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1888No. 11,891PublishedCited by 62 opinions

From the Jasper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

It is charged in the complaint that near Putnamville the track of the railroad is laid in a deep cut over which is a bridge upon a public highway; that the railroad company negligently constructed, and has negligently maintained, the bridge so low as not to afford sufficient space to allow brakemen walking or standing upon freight cars in the discharge of their duty in the management of trains to pass under it with safety; that the railway company could, and should, have so constructed the bridge that brakemen could thus pass under it in safety; that it had full knowledge that the bridge was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hahn v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API