Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Sandford
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
The appellee alleges in her complaint that Charles W. Sandford, her intestate, was in the appellant’s service in the capacity of a baggage-master; that, on the line of the appellant’s railroad, and forming part of its road, was a bridge across a stream; that, on the 24th day of December, 1883, and for a long time prior to that day, the appellant had negligently permitted the bridge to become unsafe; that the piers were weak and not capable of resisting the force of floods to which the stream was subject; that, on the 24th day of December, 1883, while the plaintiff’s intestate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Wright v. . New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.