Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Sandford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1889No. 13,454PublishedCited by 57 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The appellee alleges in her complaint that Charles W. Sandford, her intestate, was in the appellant’s service in the capacity of a baggage-master; that, on the line of the appellant’s railroad, and forming part of its road, was a bridge across a stream; that, on the 24th day of December, 1883, and for a long time prior to that day, the appellant had negligently permitted the bridge to become unsafe; that the piers were weak and not capable of resisting the force of floods to which the stream was subject; that, on the 24th day of December, 1883, while the plaintiff’s intestate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wright v. . New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API