Legal Opinion
Oberlander v. Sullivan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 9, 2002No. AC 21619PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*742 Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant James F. Sullivan, in his official capacity as commissioner of transportation (commissioner), appeals following the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the present action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the court properly concluded that the plaintiff, Linda Oberlander,2 had provided adequate notice of her injuries and their cause to the commissioner, as required by General Statutes § 13a-144.3
The following procedural history is relevant to our resolution of the commissioner’s appeal. On November 17, 1997,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tyson v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- FRANDY v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Filippi v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Boykin v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Oberlander v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002