Legal Opinion
Bresnan v. Frankel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1992No. 14480PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, in a negligence action against the commissioner of the department of transportation for injuries caused by an accident resulting from a defective highway, the plaintiff complied with the notice provisions of General Statutes § 13a-144.1 The plaintiff, Timothy P. Bresnan, contests the validity of the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to give the defendant, Emil H. Frankel, the commissioner of transportation, adequate notice of the location where the accident occurred. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Warkentin v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Zotta v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Bellman v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Murray v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.