Legal Opinion

FRANDY v. Commissioner of Transportation

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 27, 2011No. AC 32979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The defendant commissioner of transportation, Joseph Marie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to dismiss the first count of the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Karen Frandy. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly denied the motion to dismiss for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the written notice provided to the defendant by the plaintiff, pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-144, was fatally defective for failing to set forth a general description of the cause of the injury. Because we agree with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Frandy v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API