Legal Opinion

Boykin v. State

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 9, 2018No. AC39392Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

The plaintiff, Eric Boykin, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the present action against the defendants, the state of Connecticut and James P. Redeker, Commissioner of Transportation (commissioner), 1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that sovereign immunity deprived it of subject matter jurisdiction because his written notice of claim pursuant to the state highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a-144, 2 was patently defective in its description of the cause of his injury. We agree with the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Tedesco v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Oberlander v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Salgado v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. FRANDY v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API