Legal Opinion

Filippi v. Sullivan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 19, 2003No. AC 23136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant1 James F. Sullivan, commissioner of transportation (commissioner), appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the plaintiffs highway defect claim made pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-144.2 On appeal, the commissioner claims that the written statutory notice to him was patently defective, which deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction.3 We reverse the trial court’s denial *798of the motion to dismiss and remand the case with direction to dismiss the action.

The following procedural history, allegations in the pleadings and uncontested…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Zotta v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Schaap v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API