East Wind Express, Inc. v. Airborne Freight Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— East Wind Corporation appeals a summary judgment finding that it did not have a franchise relationship with Airborne Freight Corporation and, therefore, Airborne could terminate its contract at will. Holding that East Wind is an independent contractor, not a franchisee, we affirm.
FACTS
Airborne Freight Corporation (Airborne) conducts a nationwide delivery service for packages from pick-up point to ultimate destination. Airborne receives packages at one of several stations located around the country; from there the packages go to Wilmington, Ohio, where they are sorted and routed to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Morris v. International Yogurt Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Gentis v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Corp v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pulcino v. Federal Express Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. MAK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rash v. Providence Health & ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.