Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW AND DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (Docket No. 18)
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay have brought a putative class action against Defendants C.R. England, Inc., Opportunity Leasing, Inc. and Horizon Truck Sales and Leasing, LLC, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Roberts and McKay allege numerous causes of action under California, Utah and Indiana law, as well as the Federal Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lacross v. Knight Transportation, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- My Daily Choice, Inc. v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- My Daily Choice, Inc. v. DonnellDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.