Legal Opinion
Corp v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1993No. 59901-7PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
We granted review of a published Court of Appeals decision remanding this case for a factual determination of whether changes made in a franchise agreement constituted a nonrenewal or termination of the agreement under Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA), RCW 19.100. We reverse and affirm the judgment of the trial court that, as a matter of law, the changes did not constitute nonrenewal or termination of the franchise agreer ment under Washington law.
Facts
In the early 1970's, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) began a minimarket program combining gasoline sales with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Ralph Remus and Ralph's Standard, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Ziegler Co., Inc. v. RexnordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lobdell v. Sugar 'N Spice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- East Wind Express, Inc. v. Airborne Freight Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- JM Vidal, Inc. v. Texdis USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Fleetwood v. Stanley Steemer International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2010
- Medicine Shoppe Intern., Inc. v. TambelliniDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.