Legal Opinion

Jones v. County of Coconino

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 01-0148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 In question is a Coconino County zoning ordinance that prohibits the enlargement or extension of a nonconforming use. Specifically, the issue is whether the ordinance precludes moving a structure from which hay is sold from the place the structure occupied when it became a nonconforming use to another location on the same property. Such a change in location is prohibited by the ordinance, and we therefore reverse the judgment entered in favor of the property owners.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Ernest and Dorothy Jones own 2.3 acres in an unincorporated area of Coconino County east…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Berenter v. GallingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry v. SienerthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Redelsperger v. City of AvondaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Eaton v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. County of Cochise v. FariaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Simms v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API