Superior Uptown, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

The dual nature of the relief granted by the Court of Common Pleas and affirmed by the Court of Appeals frames the issues presented in this appeal.

I

Appellant advances two reasons in support of its contention that the lower courts erred'in holding the rezoning ordinance unconstitutional. The first is procedural in nature. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict. The basis of the motion was chiefly an allegation that appellee had failed to prove its ownership of the property in question. Some confusion has been caused by the use of various names…