Legal Opinion

Haslund v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976No. 43675PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

A jury verdict of $2,896,534 was entered in favor of plaintiffs, Roanoke Reef Associates and the individuals comprising the association, against the defendant, the City of Seattle, for damages alleged to have resulted from issuance of an invalid building permit by the City. Appellant City contends the trial court committed error in six respects: failure to properly instruct the jury on theories of liability; failure to recognize governmental immunity; failure to bar the plaintiffs’ claim by application of the statute of limitations; failure to find the City’s employee acted ultra vires;…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API