Driscoll v. Austintown Associates
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
This case presents two issues for determination: The effect of the unappealed 1971 declaratory judgment order on the 1973 injunction suit, and the effect of the restrictive convenants on appellants’ proposed use of their property.
I
The major contention of Willowcrest’s declaratory judgment action was that the existing zoning ordinance, as it applied to the 13-acre tract of land to prohibit its use for multi-family dwelling units, was unconstitutional. The 1971 declaratory judgment order agreed with this contention and ordered' the township zoning inspector to issue permits for the construction…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.