Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. Austintown Associates

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1975No. 74-204PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

This case presents two issues for determination: The effect of the unappealed 1971 declaratory judgment order on the 1973 injunction suit, and the effect of the restrictive convenants on appellants’ proposed use of their property.

I

The major contention of Willowcrest’s declaratory judgment action was that the existing zoning ordinance, as it applied to the 13-acre tract of land to prohibit its use for multi-family dwelling units, was unconstitutional. The 1971 declaratory judgment order agreed with this contention and ordered' the township zoning inspector to issue permits for the construction…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API