Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1973No. 72-421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Appellant propounds three propositions of law, each relative to the issue of sovereign immunity. These propose that Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, as amended in 1912, is self-executing and authorizes suits against the state of Ohio and its political subdivisions brought by individuals injured by the negligence of its agents, servants and employees; that Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, as adopted in 1968, requires the Ohio Supreme Court to establish procedures for bringing suits against the state, and that such procedures have been established by this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Superior Uptown, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. City of Bowling GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Watson v. McGeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  5. Nanna v. Village of McArthurOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API