Kopylec v. TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
Connecticut Appellate Court
1DissentLavine, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, which affirms the judgment of the trial court on a ground not raised by either of the parties. See footnote 4 of this dissent. To date, the defendant, the town of North Branford (town), has not remediated the property as ordered by the court, and therefore it has incurred no debt. I would reverse the judgment of the trial court and order the subject lien discharged.
On appeal, the plaintiff, Joseph Kopylec, claims the court, Corradino, J., erred when it failed to grant his application to discharge the lien on the subject property. More…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hansel v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. KelepeczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Shawmut Bank v. Brooks Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.