Legal Opinion
Alswanger v. Smego
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 24, 2001No. SC 16309PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The issue in this appeal1 is whether allegations asserted in an amended complaint related back to the original complaint and, therefore, were timely under General Statutes § 52-584.2 The plaintiffs, Herman Alswanger (Alswanger) and his wife, Myma Alswanger, appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly reached one or more of the following conclusions of law: (1) that the amendments to the informed consent allegation necessarily stated a claim for battery, rather than…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Janusauskas v. FichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.