Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 22a-42a (c), as amended by Public Acts 1987, No. 87-533, § 6,1 the plaintiffs, Ernest and Florine Caron, applied to the defendant Berlin inland wetlands and watercourses commission2 for a permit to place fill and to construct drainage systems and roadways for a proposed residential subdivision. The application was stamped received on October 20, 1988, and the commission’s next regularly scheduled meeting was *63November 1,1988. The plaintiffs requested and were granted a continuance. The commission considered the plaintiffs’ application on December…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Farrell v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Langan v. WeeksConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Yanni v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Koepke v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.