Legal Opinion

Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2017No. 7161 S-15802PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A father requested court-appointed counsel in a child custody modification proceeding after learning that the mother had hired a private attorney. The court denied the request. The father—supported in part by several amici curiae—claims that the denial violated his due process and equal protection rights under the Alaska Constitution. We disagree: We decline to expand our prior decisions by mandating court-appointed counsel for every indigent parent in a child custody proceeding when the opposing parent is represented by private counsel, and we conclude…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Dara v. GishAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of Alexina RodmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Regina C. v. Michael C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API