Legal Opinion

D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2000No. S-8294PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court terminated a mother’s parental rights in 1997. In doing so, it relied on findings it had made in 1995, when it adjudicated the mother’s children to be in need of aid. It had made those adjudication findings under the clear and convincing evidence standard, rather than the usual preponderance standard, at the state’s request. Did the superior court’s reliance on the those findings violate the mother’s due process rights, where the state gave no advance notice of its request until the beginning of the adjudication heating? Despite the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Maisy W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. S.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API