Doe v. State, Department of Public Safety
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal presents a discrete question left unanswered by the United States Supreme Court in its recent decision rejecting a constitutional challenge to Alaska's sex offender registration statute. After he was convicted of a sex offense, John Doe1 received a suspended imposition of sentence (SIS), subject to satisfying specified conditions. When Doe's probationary period expired without imposition of sentence, the superior court set aside his conviction under authority of AS 12.55.085(e). The Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act (ASORA) 2 became…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Green Party of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.