Legal Opinion

Doe v. State, Department of Public Safety

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2004No. S-10338PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal presents a discrete question left unanswered by the United States Supreme Court in its recent decision rejecting a constitutional challenge to Alaska's sex offender registration statute. After he was convicted of a sex offense, John Doe1 received a suspended imposition of sentence (SIS), subject to satisfying specified conditions. When Doe's probationary period expired without imposition of sentence, the superior court set aside his conviction under authority of AS 12.55.085(e). The Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act (ASORA) 2 became…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. Green Party of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API