A. Fred Miller v. Purvis
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
A. Fred Miller, a professional corporation (Miller), represented Mary Jane Purvis in a divorce case and charged her $34,914.50 in fees, $1,017.61 for expenses, $4,596.97 in interest, and $1,624.97 in sales tax. Purvis invoked the mandatory fee arbitration provisions of Alaska Bar Rules 34-42. Prior to the hearing, Purvis had paid Miller $17,-017.01 and Miller had reduced its fee by $6,200; Miller claimed that Purvis still owed $24,924.64. The arbitration panel concluded that “a reasonable fee payment would have been $8,500 and that [Miller] should be required to repay…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Nodvin v. State Bar of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs MotorhomesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.