State ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Kistler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This court has held on numerous occasions that a writ of prohibition will issue only when the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must amount to an unauthorized usurpation of judicial power; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no adequate remedy. See, e. g., State, ex rel. Northern Ohio Tel. Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6, 8; State, ex rel Gilligan, v. Hoddinott (1973), 36 Ohio St.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Gilligan v. HoddinottOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Farra v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Rockwell International v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.