Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Ford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1980No. 79-1252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A writ of prohibition will issue only when: “(1) the court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must amount to an unauthorized usurpation of judicial power; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in an injury for which there is no adequate remedy.” State, ex rel. D.P. & L. Co., v. Kistler (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 21, 22.

There is no question that appellee is a judicial officer who is about to exercise judicial power. The exercise of that judicial power would also amount to an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. KistlerOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Wells v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mullins v. Whiteway Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Jefferson County Children Services Board v. HallockOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Sowell v. LovingerOhio Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API