Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1975No. 75-354PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeebbRT, J.

Appellants contend that the statutory language within R. C. 4112.05(B), concerning efforts to resolve alleged discriminatory practices by conciliation, is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the proper issuance of a complaint by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.

R. C. 4112.05(B) sets forth specific procedures to be followed by the commission and, in pertinent part, states:

“Whenever it is charged in writing and under oath by a person, referred to as the complainant, that any person, referred to as the respondent, has engaged or is engaging in unlawful discriminatory practices, or upon its own…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Chestnut Run & Affiliated FacilitiesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HICKEY-MITCHELL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Little Forest Medical Center v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Genaro. v. Central Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Baab v. AMR Services Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API