Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1980No. 79-1443PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The central issue before this court is whether the Court of Common Pleas properly directed the telephone company, a non-party to an ex parte hearing, to aid law enforcement officials with technical assistance necessary for the implementation of a pen register to investigate a continual course of alleged criminal activity, which there was probable cause to believe was being committed over telephone lines owned, operated and exclusively controlled by appellant.1

A pen register only records the number dialed on a particular telephone. The United States Supreme Court, in describing the mechanics…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  5. State ex rel. Parma Cty. Gen. Hosp. v. O'DonnellOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API